Addressing the shortcomings associated with Traditional Learning and Learning Management Systems, Learning Experience Platforms (LXP) came forth. With more personalized learning experiences, they help participants discover new learning opportunities, enhance their skill sets, and perform better in achieving the organization’s objectives while improving their own productivity.
However, to realize their full potential, it is necessary to draw a comparison between traditional learning and LXP-based learning.
Here’s what we’ll cover in this article:
- What is Traditional Training?
- What is a Learning Experience Platform (LXP)?
- Difference between Traditional Training and LXP-Based Learning
- Future Prospects of Traditional Training and LXP-Based Learning
- Key Takeaways
What is Traditional Training?
Traditional training represents the conventional approach to workplace learning. It resembles a classroom setting where everyone follows a predetermined curriculum. It involves structured and scheduled learning sessions. Traditional training often lacks the flexibility and personalization seen in LXPs
Uniform Training: Traditional training follows a one-size-fits-all approach. In this training method, everyone undergoes the same curriculum regardless of individual job roles or skill levels.
Basic Skills Development: Focused on teaching fundamental skills necessary for a job, traditional training lays the groundwork before delving into more complex tasks.
Scheduled Learning: Learning occurs at fixed times, and sessions may not always align with daily work activities. It’s akin to having set class schedules that everyone adheres to.
Formal Approach: Traditional training is more formal and structured, potentially lacking the engaging elements of modern learning experiences.
What are Traditional Training methods used for?
Traditional training methods are employed to impart foundational skills essential for a job. The approach is standardized, with everyone undergoing the same training simultaneously. It’s like following a set curriculum to ensure a baseline of knowledge across the workforce.
Methods include lectures, workshops, and written materials, providing information in a formal setting. While effective for basic skills, this approach may fall short in catering to individual preferences and adapting to diverse learning styles.
What is a Learning Experience Platform (LXP)?
Learning Experience Platforms (LXPs) serve as personalized guides for workplace learning. Unlike traditional training methods, LXPs offer a flexible and engaging approach, resembling an exciting journey where individuals can choose what, when, and how they learn.
Personalized Learning Paths: LXPs craft customized learning journeys based on an individual’s job role, existing skills, and learning preferences. It’s akin to having a tailored roadmap designed to meet specific needs.
Advanced Skills Development: LXPs go beyond basic training, providing resources and modules for individuals to acquire advanced skills. It’s like having access to a magical book of knowledge to excel in their roles.
Agile Learning: Learning is seamlessly integrated into daily work, making it a continuous and dynamic process. It’s like learning on the go, adapting to the evolving demands of the job.
Engaging Experience: LXPs infuse fun into learning through gamification elements, interactive content, and challenges. This transforms learning into an enjoyable and exciting adventure.
What are LXPs used for?
LXPs are designed to make workplace learning more enjoyable, effective, and tailored to individual needs. As personal learning coaches, LXPs understand job roles, current skills, and career aspirations, providing a mentor-like experience. These platforms ensure that learning is a task and an ongoing growth journey.
They facilitate a holistic learning environment, incorporating games and interactive content to engage users. Unlike traditional methods, LXPs offer the flexibility to access learning materials anytime, creating a supportive and accessible learning ecosystem.
Difference between Traditional Training and LXP-Based Learning
This comprehensive table delineates the substantial differences between Traditional Training and LXP-based learning across various critical aspects of learning and education.
|Primarily in-person, classroom-based instruction with textbooks, lectures, and workshops.
|Virtual, accessible 24/7 through a digital platform using multimedia resources like videos, simulations, and interactive modules.
|Limited personalization; standardized content delivery.
|Highly personalized; adaptive content tailored to individual learning styles, preferences, and skill gaps.
|Limited flexibility due to fixed schedules and physical presence requirements.
|High flexibility; on-demand access from anywhere with internet connectivity, allowing self-paced learning.
|Less interactive, mostly reliant on face-to-face interaction and static materials.
|High interactivity with engaging multimedia resources, fostering active participation and immersive learning experiences.
|Less adaptable to diverse learning styles and individual needs.
|Highly adaptable; AI-driven algorithms adjust content based on learner behavior, ensuring relevance and effectiveness.
|Limited collaborative opportunities in traditional classroom settings.
|Encourages collaboration through online forums, social learning features, and peer-to-peer interaction, enhancing engagement.
|Relies on traditional resources like textbooks, lectures, and physical materials.
|Offers diverse multimedia resources (videos, podcasts, simulations) catering to various learning preferences and styles.
|Relatively lower autonomy, following a structured curriculum or syllabus.
|Provides higher autonomy; learners have control over their learning paths, choosing content aligned with their goals.
|Feedback and Analytics
|Feedback mechanisms are often limited, with less emphasis on performance analytics.
|Offers robust feedback loops and detailed analytics, tracking learner progress and optimizing content for better outcomes.
|Cost and Scalability
|Traditional methods may involve higher costs for physical resources and limited scalability.
|Generally cost-effective due to digital nature; scalable to accommodate large numbers of learners with minimal infrastructure.
|Limited accessibility due to location-based sessions and time constraints.
|Highly accessible; available remotely, enabling learning from anywhere, anytime, overcoming geographical barriers.
Future Prospects of Traditional Training vs LXP-Based Learning
The future outlook for Traditional Training appears challenged yet ripe for transformation. With over 30% of imminent job skills not existing today, the pace of skill evolution is accelerating. Future careers remain uncharted, with over half of today’s school starters heading toward jobs yet to emerge. However, it can be stated that traditional education faces uncertainty, demanding a paradigm shift. Geographically limitless, personalized learning is paramount.
The future prospects of Learning Experience Platforms (LXPs) appear promising and on a growth trajectory. Their popularity surged notably, especially amid the remote work surge driven by the COVID-19 pandemic. As the Learning and Development (L&D) market expands, experts foresee a continuous upward trend. AI-driven tools, particularly generative AI, are revolutionizing the landscape, enhancing efficiency, and shaping the industry’s evolution.
According to RedThread, a learning technology research firm, 42% of learning system providers surveyed in 2023 are actively exploring generative AI and large language models. Additionally, the burgeoning creator economy is spotlighting LXPs, projecting a future where these platforms play a pivotal role in shaping learning experiences.
While L&D teams in tech organizations struggle with the pressure to minimize training costs, it is important for them to recognize that investing in a good LXP is the ultimate solution. It not only helps overcome financial burdens because you only pay for what you actually use, but it also fosters employee retention. With an easy-to-use and intuitive interface and personalized, role-appropriate training for your employees, you build a team adept at handling their roles and responsibilities.
Techademy’s Unified LXP brings you solutions catering to your specific needs. From talent acquisition to skilling, mobility, deployment, and talent management, we offer LXPs in three different avatars, each promising its set of unique and immersive features. Adding additional value to your training program, ULXP brings in Virtual Instructor Led Training (VILT) through our mentoring platform, Virtutor. The platform is tailored for a blended learning experience, so your team need not shift entirely online; rather, they can enjoy the perks of both virtual and classroom mentoring. Explore the details and make a smart choice today!
FAQs about Traditional Training vs LXP-Based Learning
What are the benefits of an LXP?
LXP allows employees to learn and consume content at their convenience. Unlike a traditional LMS, LXPs help learn in the flow of the work. This enables employees to acquire knowledge, upskill, and maximize their productivity.
How does LXP-based learning improve employee productivity?
In the competitive corporate environment, the best way to excel is to enhance the skill sets of employees. They will be able to perform better in achieving the objectives of the organization. Moreover, their in-depth knowledge and honed skills will improve their productivity. An LXP guides employees towards self-improvement by accelerating their teamwork, coordination, efficiency, and career growth.